Posts

Showing posts from July, 2005

REHABBING SANDY BURGLAR ON PBS

Charlie Rose, on PBS , presented the admitted document thief now known as Samuel Berger on his show as a commentator about the war in Iraq. This is the beginning of Berger's media rehabilitation. I was stunned to see him in public for the first time since his media disappearance after the document scandal, with no mention of his disgrace. Mr. Rose gave him quite a bit of time, along with Gen. Brent Scowcroft, debating the strategy in Iraq. All the while, I'm thinking "why doesn't he ask Berger about the documents he stole?" Rose must have promised not to "ambush" him, but he should have, especially after 9/11 was mentioned . This just shows how Democrats who violate national security are given a free pass by the liberal media, at the same time they relentlessly pursue any possibility that a Republican may be involved in exposing a CIA agent who abused her power for political purposes, calling that a violation of national security. If Karl Rove comes on

WASHINGTON TIMES GETS IT RIGHT ON SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM

A great post over at the BLOG ALLIANCE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM (thanks, guys, I still support the cause) alerted me to a Washington Times op-ed piece about the Dems' hypocrisy on this issue. Some excerpts from the Times: "Plain and simple, through the voluntary personal retirement accounts in the president's plan, low-wage workers will benefit greatly. In addition to their Social Security benefits upon retirement, because of the PRA's, they will have an additional nest egg of well over $100,000. Something that is impossible under the current, failing system." "Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid knows this, as does House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. They, along with the rest of the Democratic leadership know that low-wage earners living from paycheck to paycheck will realize a dramatic increase in their savings with personal retirement accounts." "The system is failing, the Democrats know it and, yet, they have been basically ordered by Mr. Reid

LOBBYING SEN. SCHUMER FOR "GINSBURG STANDARD"

Republican Vet posts at Crosses aCross America for people to lobby Sen. Schumer (D-NY) to give Judge Roberts the same consideration given to Justice Ginsburg in her confirmation hearing. In support of this effort, and being a constituent of Sen. Schumer, I emailed the following: Dear Sen. Schumer: Please remember "the Ginsburg standard" during the upcoming confirmation hearings of Judge Roberts. If you confront him over questions he cannot possibly answer, you will be seen as divisive, not to mention obstructionist. These are the very arguments you make against the Bush administration in general. Don't come off as a hypocrite; ask sensible questions, and then vote your concience. That's all I ask of you. -FROM A CONCERNED NEW YORKER Short, and to the point. Sen. Schumer doesn't even send automated form responses to his constituents, though Sen. Clinton does. Still, it's important to express this point of view to my elected representatives, especially when t

WHAT IS A MODERATE MUSLIM?

Look at this AP headline: "Moderate Muslims Split on Suicide Bombings." Here are some excerpts: "Three days earlier at the London Central Mosque, 22 imams and scholars also condemned the July 7 attacks and said the four British Muslim suspects should not be considered martyrs because innocent civilians were killed. But the Muslim leaders stopped short of condemning all suicide bombings. 'There should be a clear distinction between the suicide bombing of those who are trying to defend themselves from occupiers, which is something different from those who kill civilians, which is a big crime,' said Sayed Mohammed Musawi, the head of the World Islamic League in London. Underlining the sensitivity of the issue, Musawi's contention that attacks are justified against 'occupiers' came only after a spokesman for the leaders read a carefully worded statement condemning the London attacks. Even so, none of the other scholars and imams at the event expressed di

LEAV IS CO-AUTHORING THE "STOP THE ACLU.COM" NEW YORK BLOG!

I'm posting to announce a new blog that I will be co-authoring with Magua from LIBERALS SUCK . The blog is the "local chapter" of STOP THE ACLU.COM . This is not like the loose affiliation I have with the BLOG ALLIANCE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM , where I can't even post (though I support them fully). It's also more responsibility than I have in my open contribution relationship with the LOVE AMERICA FIRST blog. This is a chance to do something I've wanted to do for some time, which is get into the issues that bother me on a national and international level, and write about them on a more local level. The NYCLU is an outrage, infecting our State government so thoroughly that NY has some of the weakest laws against child molesters. New York's recently reinstated death penalty has effectively been thrown out by a court system corrupted by years of NYCLU influence. I intend to find out just how that influence is peddled, which is a huge job, here in the &q

WHY DID THEY BOMB LONDON: OUR ACTIONS OR OUR IDEAS?

I've got some thoughts for the emerging crowd of pundits and politicians blaming the Liberation of Iraq for the terrorist bombings in London. -You know, many of the same ones who are saying that Pres. Bush is imposing a Taliban-like Christianity on our country. Instead of seeing the London bombings as a reaction to an unprovoked crusade against the Muslim world, let's take a deeper look at what the Islamofascists hate about the West. First, there's Madonna, Britney, and all the other "whores" (as they're called) that we allow to prance around half-naked in our media, which is increasingly available in Muslim countries throughout the world on satellite broadcasts. Second, all of the homosexuality that we allow, and show off in our media. (The big secret is that there are actually gay Muslims, though "in the closet" doesn't quite do justice to how they must live in areas ruled by radical Islamists.) Third, that we tolerate all religious beliefs, as